Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Colgan, J. P. Articles by Fleck, R. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Large-magnitude Miocene extension of the Eocene Caetano caldera, Shoshone and Toiyabe Ranges, Nevada

¹ U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
² Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
³ U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA

Because major mineral deposits in north-central Nevada predate significant Basin and Range extension, a detailed understanding of the timing and kinematics of extensional faulting is necessary to place these deposits in their original structural context. The complexity of pre-Cenozoic deformation in northern Nevada makes restoring Basin and Range faulting difficult without locating well-dated, regionally extensive Cenozoic units that can be used to restore slip along normal faults. The goal of this study is to reconstruct extensional faulting in the Shoshone and northern Toiyabe Ranges by using Cenozoic rocks in and around the Caetano caldera, which formed ca. 33.8 Ma during eruption of the Caetano Tuff. The caldera filled with more than 4 km of intracaldera tuff during initial caldera-forming eruptions, and additional sedimentary and volcanic rocks subsequently filled the topographic depression left by the caldera collapse. These rocks are conformable over the interval 34–25 Ma, consistent with little, if any, extension during that time. The 34–25 Ma rocks were later cut by a set of closely spaced (1–3 km) normal faults that accommodated significant extension and foot-wall rotations of 40°–50°. Restored structural cross sections indicate that the present 42 km (east-west) width of the Caetano caldera has been extended 110%, resulting in 22 ± 3 km westward translation of the Fish Creek Mountains relative to the southern Cortez Range. Major normal faults mapped within the caldera continue south and north along strike into the surrounding Paleozoic basement rocks; therefore it is likely that parts of surrounding areas are also significantly extended. Miocene (16–12 Ma) sedimentary rocks in the hanging walls of major normal faults include both fluvial/lacustrine facies and coarser alluvial fan deposits. Where exposed, the bases of the Miocene sedimentary sections are in angular conformity with underlying 40°E tilted 34–25 Ma volcanic and sedimentary rocks. The distribution, composition, and geometry of these deposits are best explained by accumulation in a set of half-graben basins that formed in response to slip on basin-bounding faults. Extension thus appears to have taken place in the middle Miocene, beginning at or shortly after 16 Ma, and was mostly completed by 10–12 Ma. Fault blocks and basins formed during middle Miocene extension are cut by younger, more widely spaced, high-angle normal faults that began forming more recently than 10–12 Ma. These faults outline the modern basins and ranges in the study area and some have remained active into the Holocene.

Keywords: Basin and Range Province • Miocene • extensional tectonics • calderas

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.C. Fosdick and J.P. Colgan Miocene extension in the East Range, Nevada: A two-stage history of normal faulting in the northern Basin and Range GSA Bulletin, September 1, 2008; 120(9-10): 1198 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. J. Gonsior and J. H. Dilles Timing and evolution of Cenozoic extensional normal faulting and magmatism in the southern Tobin Range, Nevada Geosphere, August 1, 2008; 4(4): 687 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Henry Ash-flow tuffs and paleovalleys in northeastern Nevada: Implications for Eocene paleogeography and extension in the Sevier hinterland, northern Great Basin Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 1 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Wallace, M. E. Perkins, and R. J. Fleck Late Cenozoic paleogeographic evolution of northeastern Nevada: Evidence from the sedimentary basins Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 36 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]